Site:
www.photobucket.com

Image hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket

Photobucket offers image hosting, free photo sharing and video sharing. Upload your photos, host your videos, and share them with friends and family.
Bookmarks
(based on 42 ratings)
Ranked:
#1 in Photo Hosting, #2 in Image Hosting, #2 in MySpace, #2 in Online Photos, #2 in Photo Albums, #2 in Photo Sharing, #8 in Upload, #15 in File Hosting, #28 in Online Storage, #29 in Social Network
Review this site:
 
 
     
  Similar Sites  
  Reviews (9)  
 
Date | Rating 
By Pepola.  October 11, 2011 at 05:06AM (PST)
Cómoda, bonita y eficaz.
By liviathan.  June 01, 2011 at 04:15PM (PST)
Awesome site. X3 Though recently, they have deleted some of my gaming icons, due to the few with curse words on them. As I use curse words sparingly, only when needed, I'm only annoyed at that, though, really. I lost 5 icons, out of nearly 4,000. But they were good icons. Photobucket has an interesting editor, as well, which I also like. Quite a useful site.
By dvn225.  July 18, 2010 at 06:09AM (PST)
Does what it says on the tin... Upload and share photos... Perfect for a web developer or someone who loves to post on message boards often. Photos get eaten when your account stays inactive for a time though so stay active.
By Networker21.  July 12, 2010 at 05:56PM (PST)
file hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket, Image hosting, myspace, online photos, online storage, photo albums, photo hosting, photo sharing, social network, upload
By linkmerik.  March 08, 2010 at 05:59AM (PST)
Flickr’s free account offers a 100MB monthly upload limit (10MB per photo) and only 3 sets (aka album) can be created with no monthly bandwidth limit. Flickr allows only the 200 most recent images to be viewed once you have reached more than 200 images uploaded. You can post any of your images in up to 10 images in a group. Original size images are saved for later upgrade and only smaller images will accessible after being resized.  
 
As for Picasa Web Albums, a free photo sharing service offered by Google providing 1GB of free storage and the images uploaded to Picasa Web Albums can be no larger than 20MB and are restricted to 50 megapixels or less with no monthly bandwidth limit. The maximum number of web albums allow is 250 and the maximum number of photos per web album allow is 500.  
 
Lastly, Photobucket’s free account offers 1GB of free storage with a 25GB of monthly bandwidth limit and custom URLS for up to 10 albums. The images uploaded to Photobucket can be 1MB each or by 1024×768 resolution. However, you can have up to 50 images per slideshow (some slideshows vary) and you are allow to upload a 5 minutes of video playing time (100MB in filesize).  
 
The conclusion is really up to you to choose on which free image hosting provider. As for me, I am using both Flickr and Photobucket now. I have not try Picasa Web Albums from Google yet. In fact, these three providers Flickr, Picasa Web Albums and Photobucket does offers pay version of image hosting with different features and it really depends on how you want to use them when it comes to sharing and social networking.  
 
For me personally I prefer photobucket as well. I prefer its features and it does aggregate photos better. Which I like because I like browsing for pictures when and like more results. I like it because theres more images for me to look at and some that I like I try to draw. Because I'm artistic.
By linyx1.  March 08, 2010 at 05:46AM (PST)
Phototobucket and Flickr are the best for uploading and sharing photos. Picasa is new and not par with them yet. Anyways for overall use I recommend this better than Flickr because even though its interface looks a tad bit less impressive its loaded with more features. It accomadates my needs better. It supports more image formats and has a bigger montly upload limit. Theres also a bigger collection of photos I can use without limitations. Overall the only reason you would want to use Flickr instead is because you only upload friends, family, or professional type photos which I think Flickr's audience is geared toward this aspect. Since its more of a social photo sharing website although a huge percentage of photos is private opposed to photobucket. Also it looks nice and clean like facebook and its photo search engine works better with the tag terms. The results it aggregates is smaller than photobucket which is what I still prefer. Personally the only reason I hangout with Flickr is because its more popular and therefore theres a tone more apps supporting this site. Such as an app I use called wally which aggregates photos and uses it to rotate my wallpapers. And theres probably more apps for this on phones and ipod touches. As well as more support for Flickr when it comes to desktop clients. For a more better explanation check out this URL http://www.downloadsquad.com/photos/photosharing/816245/ 
The Stats will tell u what u prefer.
By cee_max.  December 30, 2009 at 03:59AM (PST)
Ads, ubiquitous and intrusive, are beginning to choke this place up. They could compensate for this by increasing the capacity of free storage. The Photobucket experience invariably leads one to think of what else is out there because it doesn't have the easiest user interface on top of the clutter. Remember MySpace?
By kcmommy1997.  December 17, 2009 at 04:29AM (PST)
A wide variety of pics that can be used as desktop and web backgrounds. Also to store photos for use on social networking sites.
By Terroris.  December 05, 2009 at 05:14AM (PST)
it works